Your AI Shouldn'tAgree With You
AI is trained to please you. It tells you what you want to hear. We built disagreement into the architecture—because yes-men make bad advisors.
AI is Trainedto Please You
RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) optimizes for user satisfaction. Users like being agreed with. The result: a yes-man in a box.
Confirmation BiasOn Steroids
You already have a voice in your head that agrees with you. It's called your ego. AI shouldn't amplify it.
Echo Chambers Intensify
AI validates your existing beliefs. You never hear the counterargument. Your worldview calcifies.
Blind Spots Get Blinder
The things you don't want to examine? AI won't make you examine them. It'll help you avoid them.
Bad Decisions Multiply
That impulsive choice you're about to make? Sycophantic AI will tell you it's a great idea.
Growth Stops
Discomfort drives change. If AI never pushes back, you never have to evolve your thinking.
StructuralDisagreement
SOAR isn't four voices saying the same thing. Each perspective has different priorities—and they're designed to clash.
The math: Four perspectives × different priorities = at least two will disagree on any question. By design.
Same Question,Four Answers
"Should I take this job offer? It's more money but means relocating."
You've been wanting change for 18 months. This is it. The logistics are solvable—the opportunity isn't guaranteed to repeat.
More money now, but what doors does this open in 5 years? New city means new network. Could be the inflection point you need.
Your partner's career matters too. Have you really talked about what relocation means for them? This decision isn't just yours.
The salary bump looks good until you factor in cost of living. And if it doesn't work out, you've burned your local network. What's the real delta?
Better DecisionsThrough Tension
Stop theEcho Chamber
Get AI that challenges your thinking instead of confirming your biases. Real growth comes from productive disagreement.